Uncertainty measures for evidential reasoning I: A review
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Uncertainty measures for evidential reasoning I: A review
This paper is divided into two parts. Part I discusses limitations o f the measures of global uncertainty o f Lamata and Moral and total uncertainty o f Klir and Ramer. We prove several properties o f different nonspecificity measures. The computational complexity o f different total uncertainty measures is discussed. The need for a new measure of total uncertainty is established in Part I. In ...
متن کاملQuantifying Uncertainty in Safety Cases Using Evidential Reasoning
Dealing with uncertainty is an important and difficult aspect of analyses and assessment of complex systems. A real-time large-scale complex critical system involves many uncertainties, and assessing probabilities to represent these uncertainties is itself a complex task. Currently, the certainty with which safety requirements are satisfied and the consideration of the other confidence factors ...
متن کاملEvidential Reasoning
We consider the problem of inference on the basis of observations. Suppose Alice has two coins, F (with probability 1/2 of landing heads) and B (with probability 3/4 of landing heads). She chooses a coin, tosses it, and it lands heads. How likely was the coin to be F? How likely was it to be B? Suppose she tosses the coin 100 times, and it lands heads every time. How likely was it to be F? How ...
متن کاملEvidential Reasoning for Forensic Readiness
To learn from the past, we analyse 1,088 “computer as a target” judgments for evidential reasoning by extracting four case elements: decision, intent, fact, and evidence. Analysing the decision element is essential for studying the scale of sentence severity for cross-jurisdictional comparisons. Examining the intent element can facilitate future risk assessment. Analysing the fact element can e...
متن کاملRES: A Relative Method for Evidential Reasoning
In this paper we describe a novel method for evidential reasoning [1]. It involves mod elling the process of evidential reasoning in three steps, namely, evidence structure con struction, evidence accumulation, and deci sion making. The proposed method, called 'RfS, is novel in that evidence strength is associated with an evidential support relationship (an argu ment) between a pair of stat...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
سال: 1992
ISSN: 0888-613X
DOI: 10.1016/0888-613x(92)90009-o